Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5101 - 5120 of 8,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 1:37 pm by Jamie Markham
After all, regardless of the technicalities of the credit rules, the judge must always see to it that the defendant’s total time behind bars does not exceed his or her suspended sentence. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
Hall's indictment states he knowingly possessed the videos between June 30, 2009 and November 1, 2009. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
But different people have different self-defense needs, and they should be free to choose other means to defend themselves, as well — especially when those means are much less deadly than firearms, as is the case for stun guns.[1] Some people have religious or ethical compunctions about killing. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
Hall's indictment states he knowingly possessed the videos between June 30, 2009 and November 1, 2009. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:04 am by John Day
The trial court agreed with the defendant and ordered Dr. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
But common law does not define the entire universe of “judge administered” law in the United States.[1]This chapter, provides a brief introduction to the other manifestation of judge administered law--equity. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
Hogue, Origins of the Common Law (Indianapolis, Liberty Fund 1986 (1966)) ·      Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Common Law (Original Publication Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1881) Ch. 1, pp. 1-39__________Arthur R. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:13 am by Steven Eversole
This does not include the additional costs of staffing and operation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:00 pm
This does not include the additional costs of staffing and operation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
However, within the 10-day waiting period, background checks can be completed anywhere from 1 minute to 10 days. 20% of all DROS applications are auto-approved usually in about 1 to 2 hours, and require no further review. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/mbG5oVObtD -> Thomson Reuters: we’ll take your articles if you don’t tell us not to http://t.co/V2KJoaP4uI -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-08-20 http://t.co/NdQjiX4lUh -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-08-20: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-08-19: Computer a… http://t.co/8WwStPWvFL -> Canada's Anti-Spam Law Is a Recipe For the Abuse of Power http://t.co/dwzsYRCKce -> Goodlatte:… [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:54 am by Ken White
The defendant might win the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because, as a matter of law, being called an assmunch is nowhere near outrageous enough to support the tort.1 The judge might grant summary judgment on the grounds that California does not recognize the tort of trespass to Wookies. [read post]