Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 5101 - 5120 of 29,868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2021, 5:06 am by Christopher J. Willis
  It also points to the rescission and modification by states and other jurisdictions of stay-at-home orders, stating that “the Bureau has learned that many entities have resumed some level of in-person operations and, in many instance combined with more robust capabilities, have demonstrated improved business continuity. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   In a development that is less favorable for life sciences companies, the Second Circuit in the Nguyen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The new fine levels would take effect one year after the enactment of the statute and cover violations which occur during the intervening 12 months since enactment. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The new fine levels would take effect one year after the enactment of the statute and cover violations which occur during the intervening 12 months since enactment. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:33 am by Daniel Jin
There needs to be a level of specificity and particularisation of the documents, or the topics or questions to be sought from or put to the witness. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:28 am by Minick Law
To take your DWI defense game to the next level, visit James’ website and take a listen to today’s podcast! [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Paragraph 36(2) is not concerned with whether this state of affairs arises from a single transaction or from a series of transactions. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:46 am by Charlotte Howells and Scott J. Etish
In DR Distributors, LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc., et al., United States District Judge Iain D. [read post]