Search for: "People v Denis" Results 5101 - 5120 of 15,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s not about balancing incommensurable property v. speech, but speech v. speech which is more feasible. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:31 pm by Brian Shiffrin
And appellate courts have repeatedly rejected challenges to these arbitrarily time limits (see People v Jean, 75 NY2d 744 [trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting counsel questioning to 15 minutes in first two rounds and 10 minutes in third round of voir dire]; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 453 [2d Dept], lv denied 76 NY2d 985 [1990] [15 minute restriction in first round followed by 10 minutes in second and third rounds not an abuse of… [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  Ms Hindley… denied any wrongdoing regarding Ms Smith and said the ‘alleged markings’ four months later had never been reported to her. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Rosalind English
The existence of this hierarchy is strenuously denied of course but if it were not there, behind the scenes, what is the point of privileging Article 10 over everything else by the inclusion of Section 12 in the Human Rights Act? [read post]