Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 5101 - 5120 of 15,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
IN THE NEWS Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh testified that Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Even people who have the power to do unpopular things might sometimes hesitate to exercise such power. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:35 pm
This is all first-week-of-Conlaw1 stuff, and of course, Kavanaugh knows it. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am by Florian Mueller
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
The July letter closely echoes a European Parliament (EP) resolution passed just three weeks earlier, and the European Commission (EC) voiced similar sentiments in its review of the Privacy Shield Framework last September. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am by William Ford
Earlier this week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:45 am by bryannewland
Our tribes retained the right to fish in the ceded waters under that treaty; a fact that was confirmed in the landmark case of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
The case is Kassam v Gill & Gill reported here. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Stephanie Zable
Matthew Kahn posted audio of the full oral argument from United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
One common argument in support of indecency regulations is that they merely restrict certain modes of expression, and leave people entirely free to express whatever ideas they like; as Justice Stevens put it, defending the indecency restriction in FCC v. [read post]