Search for: "People v. Thomas" Results 5101 - 5120 of 5,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
’ Generally only idle people, pursuing ‘idle curiosity’ have time to visit court rooms in person. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
All of these people I regard as not just having acted in good faith, but having mostly got it right under very difficult circumstances. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
  If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
We’re talking about people with at least an eight digit net worth. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[15] Shareholders are people too, however, and so one can argue that the permissive scope of corporate fiduciary duties should allow for the adoption of climate-friendly policies if they generally enhance shareholder “welfare” rather than profits.[16] Also, there is wiggle room in arguments favoring  the “long-term” interests of shareholders, though future generations of not-yet-existing “shadow shareholders” are unlikely to be included.[17]… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Jonathan Macey
  So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:09 am
Thomas Sullins, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane M. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm by Nate Russell
It is absent from the most recent edition of Black’s law dictionary, and it generated but one result in a CanLII search—a passing but telling reference in the Awan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  Reasonable people can debate whether the ruling in this case was correct and who it binds. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]