Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 55,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
A court was held to have sufficient power to reduce or disallow success fees that were unreasonable. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
And in Stanton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
Texas wins a big victory against the Bush Administration in Medellin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:46 pm
For example, shifting the burden of cost as reflected in the recent appellate decision.Doolittle v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
Aka GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:30 am
Board of Education is a powerful precedent in the majority’s favor on that assumption. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 4:38 pm
Equustek: do Canadian courts have the power to make injunctive orders with worldwide effects across the internet? [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 10:23 am
., Dunn v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:33 am
That statute provides: "A judicial officer shall have the power to impose reasonable monetary sanctions, not to exceed fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500), notwithstanding any other provision of law, payable to the court, for any violation of a lawful court order by a person, done without good cause or substantial justification This power shall not apply to advocacy of counsel before the court. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
In the matter of Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:45 am
Or do they have a duty to do everything in their power to try and beat the odds and save the patient? [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Barr v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:51 am
Supreme Court in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
In the case of Powers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
I have a short commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:49 am
By Jason Rantanen General Protecht Group v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Regina (SO) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (The Children’s Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 634 1101; [2010] WLR (D) 257 “Local authorities enjoyed, by virtue of s 23C(4)(c) of the Children Act 1989, the power to accommodate a person who had formerly been a child in care and was therefore a former ‘relevant child’ within s 23A of the Act, and a local authority was not entitled, when considering whether the welfare of a former ‘relevant… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499; [2012] WLR (D) 121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in what… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:10 am
It's about respecting the people's sovereign choice to vest the legislative power in Congress alone. [read post]
