Search for: "State v. Country" Results 5101 - 5120 of 26,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
Beyond Ćurčić and Zelenović’s crimes, between 1992 and 1995 during the Bosnian War, violence permeated the country in response to Yugoslavia breaking up. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit emphatically rejected the state action argument in PragerU v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
But many countries, like the United States, have to deal with protectionist sentiment in their own countries and will be cautious and wait to see how the U.S. handles these tariffs before withdrawing them. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:58 pm by Martin H. Orlick
In a unanimous published opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of Whitaker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Johnson did more than exercise that liberty of speech guaranteed to him by the Constitution and laws of the country. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm by Maria Hook
 The facts were different from the case of Livingstone v Livingstone (1980) 4 MPC 129, where the New Zealand Court had concluded that a Canadian tax debt could “for practical purposes” be disregarded because the debtor had already left the country at the time the demand was issued, he had no intention of returning and he had removed his assets from the jurisdiction. [read post]