Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 57,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm
Additionally, the records EFF reviewed show that several of the agencies that worked with Fog have since canceled their subscriptions, and at least one said they were not sure if they ever used Fog to successfully solve a case. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:39 pm
(Sounds a lot like the rule at issue in New York State Rifle Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:59 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2020 ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:40 am
The mechanic said it's enough to raise the issue once. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:30 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly found that the Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded causes of action alleging negligence, gross negligence, and negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and direction, citing Moskowitz v Masliansky, 198 AD3d 637 and other decisions. * The Appellate Division noted "[c]auses of action alleging negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision are not statutorily required to be pleaded with… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:30 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly found that the Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded causes of action alleging negligence, gross negligence, and negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and direction, citing Moskowitz v Masliansky, 198 AD3d 637 and other decisions. * The Appellate Division noted "[c]auses of action alleging negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision are not statutorily required to be pleaded with… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Patel this week in Trump v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
In Lukaszczyk v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm
["In January 2020, you called for 'an involuntary evaluation' of President Trump, and you said, 'I am beginning to believe a mental health hold ... will become inevitable.' That same month, you publicly suggested that President Trump, Rudolph Giuliani and Alan Dershowitz had a 'shared psychosis.'"] Lee v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
Constitution, which declares “The Trial of all Crimes . . . shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
The guy can't be tried again for the same offense.You see why the Court of Appeal comes out that way.That said, I wonder how those principles really apply to prosecutions that, as here, involve "status" charges. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
From Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 am
Sure, the Supreme Court held that corporal punishment in schools was not cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment in Ingraham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:10 am
In Kane v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
Revlon and Kesler v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
Maybe the net result is a relatively "boring" state supreme court, but that's a boredom that I can more than tolerate; indeed, one of which I'm often affirmatively proud.That said, today, there's a split opinion; 4-3 (-ish), even. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
Recently, a federal appeals court held in Murray v. [read post]
