Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 5101 - 5120 of 9,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm by Florian Mueller
A week before the Federal Circuit's appellate hearing on Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Nyanza Moore
This summer, a carrier asked a Houston federal court to declare that a fire was intentional, voiding the policy and removing carrier’s liability to the insured. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
And now we have a lengthy Superior Court decision from earlier this summer (Matthews v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm by Michelle Yeary
  For some it is the day they mourn the end of summer. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
In my guest-blogging stint, I will try to place NFIB v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
The team reports that “When the United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:54 am by Francis Davey
That is the basis of the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Voyvoda v Grosvenor West End Properties, which we have managed to miss reporting because of the Summer break.Voyvoda is all about the “deferment rate” used in enfranchisement cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:54 am by Francis Davey
That is the basis of the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Voyvoda v Grosvenor West End Properties, which we have managed to miss reporting because of the Summer break.Voyvoda is all about the “deferment rate” used in enfranchisement cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
The parties have been filing their legal briefs over the summer. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:53 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For many of us, it was easy to simply think of today as the last day of summer. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Ackerman explains the Amendment’s legitimacy on the basis of President Johnson’s 1868 capitulation to a non-Article-V process, confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1873. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 [Merpel apologises to this blog's readers in the Southern hemisphere, for whom summer is winter and who have been entertaining both themselves and us with such fascinating gems as New Zealand's prophetic or head-in-the-sand attitude towards the patentability of computer programs. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Perhaps after the summer holidays, an enlightened Mr Cameron might retrieve that ball he kicked into the long grass and make some progress with these proposed reforms. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:46 pm by TDot
If you’re interested in reading the details, check out this PDF hosted on the TGD Law website: Hayes v. [read post]