Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 14,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
"This essay takes a close look at the issue of the human rights duties of states as owners of SOEs, and of the responsibilities of SOEs for their own human rights related conduct. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The United States Coast Guard named Settoon the strictly liable Responsible Party under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) (codified at 33 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
An “Officer of the United States” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause, is not simply an “employee,” but is a person who “exercise[s] significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:59 am
Mishkin The CFPB has filed an amicus brief in Billings v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:44 pm
In the United States of America court proceedings are, with rare exceptions, open to the public. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
The Wall Street Journal informs us that Trump had a much more cooperative phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in which he reportedly praised NATO and discussed the “close, longstanding relationship between the United States and Turkey and their shared commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:42 am
He says: While the United States has never decreed that everyone has a “right” to a telephone, we have come close to this with the notion of “universal service” — the idea that telephone service (and electricity, and now broadband Internet) must be available even in the most remote regions of the country. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
filed 04/04/07 closed 12/10/07 1:07-cv-01891 Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:51 pm
Raich, supra, 545 U.S. 1, 26-29; United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
The problem seems to be a criminal case from the Eleventh Circuit itself, United States v. [read post]
