Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 5121 - 5140 of 16,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
So held the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its January 10, 2018 decision in Taha v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
”[8] “With decades of hard work, socialism with Chinese characteristics has crossed the threshold into a new era. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:12 am by James Kachmar
A recent case out of the Ninth Circuit, Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Our focus has been on the idea that States need the cooperation of foreign States to have their judgments enforced in those foreign States, and since the underlying structure for such cooperation generally is weak, lacking cross-border enforcement mechanisms undermines the role of black letter law. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:11 am by Yan Luo and Phil Bradley-Schmieg
Similar to general principles of most data protection laws, the Standard requires transparency, specificity and fairness of processing purpose, proportionality (use and retention of only the minimum information necessary to achieve the stated purpose), security, risk assessment, and the respect of individuals’ rights to control the processing of information about them. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:30 am by Liisa Speaker
The case of Ray v Swager, No: 322766, came to the Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA) on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One such alternative structure would be one where examination fees came closer to covering the costs of patent processing (which constitute the vast majority of the Agency's operational costs), a structure that would reduce the need for cross-subsidization and thus reduce the risk that the parties being used for cross-subsidization purposes would grow out of step with applicants. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:19 am
  The first case the district court relied upon was a constitutional case arising from state law habeas. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
A few days later she offered to resign but the CEO refused to accept, stating she was an asset to the organization. [read post]