Search for: "H. C" Results 5121 - 5140 of 12,405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015); The Board held that only aliens who originally entered the United States as lawful permanent residents (with an immigrant visa) are barred from INA § 212(h) relief for a prior aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:17 am by Douglas Marques
Muitas vezes, se trata de cobrança de um serviço que já vinha sendo debitada há meses e o consumidor nem percebeu. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:34 am by SHG
H/T The Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
17 May 2015, 8:01 pm by Douglas Marques
É importante lembrar que, segundo o Código de Defesa do Consumidor, o prazo para reclamar de um vício oculto é de 90 dias, a partir do momento em que ficar evidenciado o problema (Art. 26). [read post]
16 May 2015, 7:51 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:57 am by John Rubin
G.S. 15A-145.5(c) states that the court “may” grant an expunction if the statutory requirements are satisfied. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
(h) The legitimate interest of the public agency or private employer in protecting property, and the safety and welfare of specific individuals or the general public. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:33 pm by Jan von Hein
Marianne Andrae, First decisions of the ECJ to the Interpretation of Article 12(3) Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, Comment to Cases C 436/13 and C 656/13 Article 12 (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 applies to separated matters of parental responsibility. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:14 pm by Douglas Marques
É o chamado direito de arrependimento, garantido pelo artigo 49 do Código de Defesa do Consumidor (CDC). [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
But proving this specific factual assertion (and proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendants knew this assertion was likely false) would be very hard. c. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
Seven under Section 4(1)(a) relating to national security, three under Section 4(1)(b) relating to courts, two under Section 4(1)(c) relating to Parliament and State Legislatures, three under Section 4(1)(d) relating to trade secrets and intellectual property rights, one each under Sections 4(1)(e) and (f) relating to fiduciary relationships and foreign relations, six under Section 4(1)(g) relating to law enforcement, three under Section 4(1)(h) relating to fair investigation and… [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:19 am by Chris Min
On May 4, CFTC Division of Clearing and Risk published a letter clarifying that a securitization SPV that is wholly-owned by, and consolidated with, a captive finance company under Section 2(h)(7)(C)(iii) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) is also eligible for the end-user exception to a clearing requirement under Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA. [read post]