Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
Abdelhak v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:47 pm
In Albanese, the critical issue before the court was whether or not the wife’s lawyer was able to establish how much the husband’s law practice has appreciated during the marriage. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
In Ramberg spousal support or alimony of $2,500 a month was set while the husband made approximately $11,250 a month and wife made approximately $1,250 a month and wife had custody of the two minor children of the parties. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 5:59 am
The name of the case is East Longmeadow Management Systems, Inc v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
Previously, I blogged on the Appellate Division's reported (precedential) decision in Kay v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
On New Year's Eve, a trucker from Texas was charged with DUI and vehicular homicide after he struck a Michigan couple's car and killed the wife, as he got off the I-75 exit at Sam Nunn Parkway in Perry, Georgia. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
Previously, I blogged on the Appellate Division's reported (precedential) decision in Kay v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am
[Michelle] Burns, [wife of Bobby Burns,] when she was his psychiatric patient. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
The case is Wheeler v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:00 pm
Such was the case in the unreported decision of Green v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:54 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals overturned a circuit court’s determination that, in a judgment of divorce, a wife was entitled to a share of her husband’s retention bonus, and any future bonuses he might earn at his current job. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
After the oral ruling but before entry of the final decree of divorce, the husband offered to purchase the wife’s interest in the house for $325,000, but the wife rejected this offer. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Paulin v Paulin & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 221 - Perhaps not an important judgment, but I was pleased that the husband's 'devious' tactic of making himself bankrupt in order to defeat the wife's claims failed. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 7:36 pm
In their culture, a wronged husband could kill his wife’s lover if he found the lover and his wife engaging in adulterous acts. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
They owned a home in Richmond, B.C. with a substantial mortgage.In Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
Citing Innovative Health Systems v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:33 pm
The Court found that wife had no claim for husband’s labor and time spent on the properties. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:15 am
In McFarlane v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
The issue for the Court of Appeal in Ariemuguvbe v Islington LBC (for our discussion of the High Court decision, see here) was whether Islington should allocate Mrs Ariemuguvbe, her husband, her five children (aged 22, 24, 27, 29, 31) and three grandchildren (aged 11 months, 1 and 2) an appropriately sized property. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
The issue for the Court of Appeal in Ariemuguvbe v Islington LBC (for our discussion of the High Court decision, see here) was whether Islington should allocate Mrs Ariemuguvbe, her husband, her five children (aged 22, 24, 27, 29, 31) and three grandchildren (aged 11 months, 1 and 2) an appropriately sized property. [read post]
