Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 70,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Can you guess what mark the NFL will be relying on? [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:21 pm
By way of background, Mark A. and Mark L. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
The post The Rise of Doctor Burnout: Navigating a Medical Negligence Case appeared first on Zevan Murphy, LLC. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
The post The Rise of Doctor Burnout: Navigating a Medical Negligence Case appeared first on Zevan Davidson Roman, LLC. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Those cases don’t tell you what to do in the next case that arises, but they’re also not wrong: there are differences in plausibility of confusion claims.Are there super-strong marks w/in category? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
Brunetti and issues orders in several other IP cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
established case? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
” (Paging Mark McKenna! [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
In this case, Mr. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:13 pm
And in any case, "even sophisticated purchasers are not immune from trademark infringement. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 12:15 pm
In many cases the name of the developer is featured as much (or more prominently) in the marketing of each development than is the name of the development itself. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:56 am
In most cases, this legal basis is “negligence. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:56 am
In most cases, this legal basis is “negligence. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:56 am
In most cases, this legal basis is “negligence. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
In any case, each mark must be evaluated on its own merits, and even if the cited mark is a weak mark, it is still entitled to protection.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: Well, was this appeal a dog, or what? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:15 am
We would like to offer our condolences to the family of Mark Randall Wallace at this time. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
The issue in the case came from a failure to file by Mattel:While Mattel was developing new toys, the USPTO cancelled the registrations for the CRASH DUMMIES marks on December 29, 2000, because Mattel did not file a section 8 declaration of use and/or excusable nonuse for the marks. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:42 am
This morning I received an e-mail “Notice of Publication” on a trademark case, the first one of these I remember seeing. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
The issue in the case came from a failure to file by Mattel:While Mattel was developing new toys, the USPTO cancelled the registrations for the CRASH DUMMIES marks on December 29, 2000, because Mattel did not file a section 8 declaration of use and/or excusable nonuse for the marks. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:01 pm
This case, too, has avoided attention among English speakers. [read post]
