Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am
Wanda Vázquez Garced was arrested yesterday on bribery charges, the Justice Department has said. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:03 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
It never even crossed her mind that Peelle was declaring his romantic interest. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
Eugene V. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
” Pratt v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
So the Court, having no real evidence before it, has no choice but to accept General DeWitt's own unsworn, self-serving statement, untested by any cross-examination, that what he did was reasonable. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
To be sure, the Complaint characterizes Ranked-Choice Voting as “exotic” and points out that some people find Ranked-Choice Voting ballots complicated. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Bergeris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm
The newspaper makes a cross application for the designation of the claim as a SLAPP based on her pre-action emails. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am
{In Hess v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:17 am
— A mobile home fire in Grimes killed two pets Thursday night, but two people escaped unhurt. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
’” In other words, peer review is a shabby substitute for cross-examination and an adversarial process.[16] That adversarial process cannot always unfold fully and fairly in front of a jury. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
