Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 5121 - 5140 of 6,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Rule 23(f) appeal  Whether interlocutory appeal is available at all in state court class actions will vary from state to state. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Several months after the patent had lapsed, Shore-Sirotin learned from Honig that the patent was licensed, and immediately sent an e-mail dated March 19, 2002, referencing the patent and its United Kingdom analogue, to Pat Tormey, an Abelman legal assistant, stating, "[P]lease do NOT DROP these patents in the U.S ... [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
” [via Illinois Supreme Court prepared summary] United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm by Susan Brenner
” As Wikipedia also explains, “an insular area is a United States territory, that is neither a part of one of the fifty U.S. states nor the District of Columbia”. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by The Legal Blog
Hilder (1849) 4 Exch 187, Parke, B., stated that where a party had received a benefit under an Order, it could not claim that it was valid for one purpose and invalid for another. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm by Steven G. Pearl
It certified the state-law claims as a class action under Rule 23(b)(2) and, alternatively, under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]