Search for: "US v. George" Results 5121 - 5140 of 6,146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
“However Justice Stevens is going to come out on an issue, he is going to do it in a way that is very friendly and avuncular and good-natured,” Paul Clement, who was George W. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Nearly three years after the US Supreme Court found that carbon dioxide was a pollutant that fell under the purview of the Clean Air Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency has agreed to explore approaches for tightening its regulations dealing with ocean acidification under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
And it is hard to discern any emerging consensus among the nonoriginalists as to what this might be.Here is another version of the argument--this time from George Stigler's 1982 Nobel Prize Lecture:Nevertheless the economic theory of regulation is achieving a substantial scientific prosperity. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:42 am by The LBN Team
 In this paper, Professor Zywicki explains how the notoriety of the Marshall v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Bernstein, Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law - Danielle Citron, Professor of Law, University of Maryland School of Law - Raphael Cohen-Almagor, Professor, Chair in Politics, University of Hull - Sandra Coliver, Senior Legal Officer, Open Society Justice Initiative - Philippe Dufresne, Director & Senior Counsel, Canadian Human Rights Commission - Bruce Etling, Director of the Internet & Democracy Project, Berkman… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
 George Will of the Washington Post also supports a restoration of the Privileges or Immunities clause, which in his view would provide “useful protection against the statism of the states. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm by PaulKostro
She testified that batterers often believe they are “privileged and entitled to coerce and control the victims using intimidating gestures, using threats, [and] depriving them of rights and freedoms” to get what they want. [read post]