Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5121 - 5140 of 13,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The plaintiffs in the following two cases originally filed their lawsuits in Missouri and Florida state courts respectively, Rodhouse v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Jessica Gutierrez Alm
Since 2013, Bossland has sold approximately 118,939 products in the United States alone. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, § 12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:09 pm
 Who established a couple of irrevocable trusts for their son.Can the United States attach the trusts to satisfy the restitution order? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel weighs in on Monday’s argument in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Chafee, Zechariah, Freedom of Speech in War Time (1919). ______________, Free Speech in the United States (1941). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bed Bath & Beyond of California, LLC, 780 F.3d1260, 1266–67 (9th Cir. 2015) (non-patent context). [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
The “fixed” original meaning of “state” is definite enough to apply to California–though California was not imagined at the time of enactment–and so is the text that allocates two senators to California irrespective of its population. [read post]
  Defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing summary judgment against his state-law claims, the Ninth Circuit rejected USA Waste’s only proffered reason for firing him—his failure to provide proof of his legal right to work in the United States—finding that the Immigration Reform and Control Act exempted him from the proof of employment eligibility the company demanded (Santillan v. [read post]