Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 107,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 7:57 am
Focusing on the first and third Emerson College factors, the Appeals Court found that Saugus's I&I reduction charge does not benefit the fee-payer in a way not shared by the community. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:13 pm
The Court of Appeals found that the circumstances of this case do not justify choosing to exercise our discretionary appellate jurisdiction over the Town’s appeal. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:50 pm
The Second Circuit recently addressed but did not decide the issue, instead certifying the issue of the father's standing to the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:54 pm
However it is important to note that the arbitrator does not have the authority to decide that the Offer in Compromise should be accepted or that the taxpayer is not liable under IRS §6672. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:58 pm
And finds that it does. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
The relief available under FLSA and CWCA does partially overlap because both laws allow employees to recover unpaid wages as compensatory damages. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
The relief available under FLSA and CWCA does partially overlap because both laws allow employees to recover unpaid wages as compensatory damages. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled today in Center v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled today in Center v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 5:18 pm
Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard, No 76146, Supreme Court of Nevada.This is a complicated case and factual scenario that does often come up in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:35 am
Disability Insurance News:Social Security Approval Does Not Mean Disability Insurance Benefits Must be Approved 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds lower court’s finding that Aetna’s denial of benefits was not wrong. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
” So, two things - a mushy dress code policy that suggests purchasing company clothing, but does not require it, and that does not mandate a particular color or article of clothing, will not support a uniform / mandatory purchase lawsuit on a class wide basis. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:02 pm
However, this broad standard of review does not require the appellate court to disregard the factual findings of the family court or ignore the fact that the family court is in the better position to assess the credibility of the witnesses. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:19 am
For DWI cases going forward, a New Jersey Appeals Court has set a new Alcotest standard on December 1, confirmed a decision that states the patrolman who administers a breath test to a drunk driving suspect does NOT need to be the same police officer who witnessed the original DWI violation. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
The court of appeals held yesterday in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:21 am
The Tennessee Supreme Court has decided to hear an appeal in a DUI case. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am
The Glidden Company, the Court of Appeals again clarified a position, this time regarding the antisubrogation doctrine -- finding that antisubrogation does not apply when the subject parties were not both insured under the same policy.In the Matter of Viking Pump, the Court of Appeals was asked to consider whether "all sums" or "pro rata" allocation applied to excess insurance policies that followed form over primary policies with a… [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
Hoffman-LaRoche and Genentech cases on BonivaHoffman-LaRoche lost its appeal at the CAFC:Plaintiff Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., (“Roche”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting the defendant genericdrug companies summary judgment of invalidity as toclaims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
In the case of In re Conservatorship of Rhea Brody, No. 332994, the Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA), affirmed the lower court’s appointment of a conservator over Rita Brody, an adult, under the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC) MCL 700.5101 et seq. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:03 pm
In that opinion, the Court of Appeals held that a parent’s obligation to pay child support does not end upon an involuntary termination of parental rights. [read post]
