Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5141 - 5160 of 8,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 For over 20 years John has has handled hundreds of coverage cases  involving Construction litigation and other complex matters for over twenty years. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 1:26 am
Negligence requires (1) A Duty Owed To Someone (2) Breach Of Duty Owed (3) Actual Causation; (4) Proximate Causation; and (5) Damages. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
The keys points from the Supreme Court, which largely re-instated the first instance decision, were, from Coventry 1: The right to commit a nuisance by noise can be acquired by prescription (20 years continuous use – or say 20 times a year for 20 years for example). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
July 28, 2014) — offered three main arguments for its position, but I don’t think they are on balance persuasive: 1. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:03 pm by Michael Lowe
Here’s what he’s facing (references to co-defendants have been omitted): Count 1 Conspiracy To Commit Bribery Concerning A Local Government Receiving Federal Funds (18 USC 371) Price allegedly got around $1,000,000 in property, cash, or new vehicles from assorted businesses for political influence. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
  Question #1:  What does the FBI Lab scandal have to do with National Whistleblower Appreciation Day? [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:35 am by emagraken
 Prior to trial the Defendant made a formal settlement offer of $1 which “expressed the defendants’ belief that the Court would conclude that Mr. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Astute and diligent gatekeeping judges and qualified juries can get the job done[20]. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
In each case, both the arrest and the overt conduct constituting the crimes charged [PL §§ 220.39(1) and 220.16(1) ] occurred entirely within Kings County. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
In each case, both the arrest and the overt conduct constituting the crimes charged [PL §§ 220.39(1) and 220.16(1) ] occurred entirely within Kings County. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Catherine Rose
The key points were as follows: (1) The statutory duty of disclosure under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 – applicable to any material “which might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the case for the prosecution or of assisting the case for the accused” – is limited to the trial period and therefore does not assist Mr Nunn (paras. 18-20). (2) The common law duty of disclosure is a general duty to disclose any… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
Defendants, the State of New York and the New York City Criminal Court, and the Judges thereof by Joan B. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  Among the arguments made by the defendants in the motion is that the AG lacks authority to bring claims under Section 1042 because (1) her purported authority is derived from the CFPB which is an unconstitutional entity, (2) Illinois law does not give the AG authority to enforce federal law, and (3) the Dodd-Frank UDAAP standard is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the second quarter, securities class action lawsuit filings represented 20 percent of all filings. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]