Search for: "Doe v. Brown"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
The government acknowledges “some disagreement” among the courts of appeals on that question, but argues “that disagreement may does not warrant intervention at this time. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
“The use of lethal drone strikes outside of recognized theaters of conflict is presumptively illegal and violates several covenant rights… [including] the right to life as the supreme right from which no derogation is permitted,” noted Canadian member Marcia V. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Defining WIPO’s role (Intellectual Property Watch) Introduction to patent monetisation resources for corporations and entrepreneurs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Top PCT filing firms revealed (IAM) Commercialising innovation mini-series – interview with industrial designer Jim Richardson (IP Watchdog) Royalty triggers are fraught with litigation risk, so handle with care (Technology Transfer Tactics) The IP zone: a new concept for introducing needed information and efficiencies into… [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:59 am
The NSA has a long history of spying on Americans, but we hadn't gotten to Jewel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
The rule change got Justice Amy Coney Barrett through the Senate, but it also got Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson through. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
" I illustrated the idea in my essay last week on the oral argument in the Rahimi case:self-styled originalists who don't want to be seen as rejecting Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
Current Rule 506 Exemptions Rule 506(c) does not modify or repeal any of the current Rule 506 exemptions and issuers may still rely on those exemptions as written. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
The judge does not weigh competing evidence or credibility or decide facts in dispute. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Because at least for me, Trump does not enter office with a presumption of regularity in his work. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court made clear in Brown v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
It derives from a case about the chief executive of a large international corporation: Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 295, [2008] QB 103. [read post]
