Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
[1] Certain employees are not subject to either the salary basis or salary level tests (for example, doctors, teachers, and lawyers). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
[i] [i] The question presented to the Supreme Court is: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
In an appeal of a 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:25 pm
Ultramercial, concurring op. at 1. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
’317 patent col.16 ll.4-9; ’863 patent col.17 ll.35-40. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
If the Rome II Regulation does apply, what is its effect in terms of defining the applicable law and its relationship with the Compensation Body Regulations? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
In New Jersey, the Judge does not have to rule that you were drunk. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Art. 1 ¶¶1-2, 4). [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
(relisted after the April 1, April 16 and April 23 conferences) Doe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
Definitions In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
§ 101, and whether the “machine-or-transformation” test for patent eligibility, contradicts Congress’s intent that patents protect “method[s] of doing business” in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Cleveland, 67 Ohio St.3d 35, 616 N.E.2d 163, in which it held, in paragraph one of the syllabus, that “the Ohio Constitution is a document of independent force. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
I'll discuss three reasons below:1. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
The findings are based on an online survey of 6,224 consumers across Brazil, China, India, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States conducted in September and October 2012.Well, what does this mean? [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
The other defenders are eight individuals, who were partners in the firm in the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2008. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm
Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.MEMORANDUM DECISIONALTICE, Judge.Debra Vance, now known as Debra Bock,[1] co-signed on a student loan for another individual, who never made payments on the loan. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:37 pm
Here are my fundamental operating rules:1. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
" N.J.S.A. 30:13-1. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
I'll break them down.1. [read post]
