Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
In an interesting opinion addressing several of the critical issues in the U.S. securities lawsuit arising out of Petrobras bribery scandal, on July 30, 2015, Southern District of New York Judge Jed Rakoff denied in part and grated in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
In Joan Carey v Rockville Centre CSD, Comm. of Ed. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
Anhing Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Reading its decision after having read the Davis judgment of the English High Court, one wonders whether legal syllogism has suddenly been replaced by useless tautology. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Better English. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:56 am
Documents from the Gold Coast Colony Supreme Court Records, Regina v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
However the English decisions of Bunt v Tilley ([2007] 1 WLR 1243) and Metropolitan International had expressed a contrary view. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:35 am
DC Comics v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
” The Judge analysed the assertions made in her letter and concluded that Ms Romanova;s language difficulties did not comprise a significant obstacle, noting that she was an educated woman who was a Professor of Journalism and had “positively asserted an ability to read and write the English language” and, in her own witness statement (in support of her application to set aside service) “indicated a relatively high level of skill in English”. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:01 pm
Valley Health System LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:08 am
Bachelder is special counsel in the Tax, Employee Benefits & Private Clients practice group at McCarter & English, LLP. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
