Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 5141 - 5160 of 6,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
Elane Photography â€" a husband-and-wife company in which the wife, Elaine Huguenin, is the head photographer (and I think the only routine photographer) â€" refused to photograph a same-sex wedding. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:15 pm by Marc J. Soss, Esq.
The Fifth Circuit recently allowed an ex-wife's testimony about conversations she had with her ex-husband about his tax evasion to be admitted at the husband's trial under the joint crimes exception to the martial communications privilege even thought he ex-wife was not charged with tax evasion herself. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:09 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
  One of the reasons why it was distinguishable was because this case, Newport v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Husband and wife Richard and Nelsi Smith were 27.5% shareholders of Meadow Mechanical Corporation formed in 1980. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:38 am
The last attempts to repeal New Hampshire's law came after a Merrimack husband filed a complaint against his wife and her boss in 1987. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:20 pm
The last attempts to repeal New Hampshire's law came after a Merrimack husband filed a complaint against his wife and her boss in 1987. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:00 am
The Fifth Circuit recently allowed an ex-wife's testimony about conversations she had with her ex-husband about his tax evasion to be admitted at the husband's trial under the joint crimes exception to the martial communications privilege even thought he ex-wife was not charged with tax evasion herself. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The former husband, after the closing, failed to comply with an earlier stipulation in the matrimonial action requiring him to buy out his wife's interest in the marital property for the sum of $95,000. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:08 am
Spano Subscription Required WESTCHESTER COUNTY Family Law Court Grants Wife's Motion to Quash Subpoenas, Denies Husband's Cross-Motion for Sanctions Strauss v. [read post]