Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 5141 - 5160 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
We're all a bit exhausted and expect that our readers are too. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
Moreover, Google designed many of its own API packages from scratch, and thus could have designed its own corresponding 37 API packages if it wanted to do so (ibid.) which, the opinion notes, "Google chose not to do". [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Such “guerilla judging” is unnecessary, he insisted, because Rule 54(b) is specifically designed to control appeals in this situation and courts have been using it for that purpose. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
 Indeed, in some respects this is the “typical” case, which explains both the insight that in design cases, the character of the product and the conduct of the manufacturer are largely inseparable, and the Third Restatement’s approach of requiring an alternative design as part of the standard of proof.Id. at *67 (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In form, this is a new suit by the petitioner against the lower court itself, designated the "respondent. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Breyer went first, beginning a lengthy interchange, generally designed to underscore the incoherence he saw in DMA’s position. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
If the world already knows Judge Chin’s takeon this point, Marie-Andrée notes that one of the Second Circuit judges has already expressed himself on the same issue in the past. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:21 am
I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcomes of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm by Florian Mueller
And design is just a limited part of the equation when we're talking about a high-tech product. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:48 pm by Jeff Nowak
 At that point, it had an obligation to determine whether the absence was covered by FMLA and designate appropriately. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:16 pm by Andrew Crocker
Compelling a company to re-engineer a product designed to provide robust encryption is the definition of unreasonably burdensome because it undermines the basic purpose of the product.[2] What’s more, forcing the installation of a generalized backdoor is not “in aid of the court’s jurisdiction,” since the court would be reaching beyond the specific targeted search to a generalized backdoor. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
"According to Maximus, about 19,000 of the 42,000 cases that were pending as of Oct. 22 were missing medical records after the deadline for submission.This is again an example of the system working as it was designed, not as intended.The design is flawed because the word "relevant" requires decision making, which is a gray area.The simple solution is to require ALL medical records be sent along with the treatment dispute, regardless of relevancy.Just send ALL the… [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
”  Nicholas Bagley weighs in with a post at The Incidental Economist, observing that to prevail the challengers in the case must “believe that the judges and commentators who read the statute differently than they do . . . are all behaving unreasonably. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:07 am by Juan C. Antúnez
November 07, 2013) If you’re a trusts and estates lawyer, a larger and larger share of your practice is going to have little — if anything — to do with our probate code. [read post]