Search for: "Little v State"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 23,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:47 am
So you'll forgive us if we have a little fun with Cynosure, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 10:22 am
In Sadler Clinic Association, P.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
Actual physical control is a little more subjective. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm
As she argues, in Little Rock in the 1950s, the "image of American democracy was at stake:" "foreign critics questioned how the United States could argue that its democratic system of government was a model for others to follow when racial segregation was tolerated in the nation. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:23 am
The CFPB further states that it plans to so advise, and to provide sufficient time to allow for orderly discontinuation of the December forms, when it issues a final rule to restate Regulation V in 2013. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
But we are bound by our Court’s decision in Sutherland v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 12:31 am
While I'm not going to reiterate my positions on copyrightability and "fair use" in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
In most cases when the Supreme Court denies review it says little about the merits of the argument. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am
Nicholas Bronni serves as the solicitor general for the state of Arkansas, which co-authored an amicus brief joined by 14 other states supporting the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Would the Ninth Circuit's ruling really be the same as it is here if we were talking about Little Rock in 1957? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
- my 2008 talk at Georgia State University on UGC legal issues. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
United States, 2004 U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:11 am
After reviewing the relevant law, the Court concluded that the enabling state law, Article 66B, grants considerable discretion to the counties in how they establish land use regulations, ranging from the comprehensive plan being anything from a mere guide to a true regulatory device, notwithstanding Article 66B's phrase "use that conforms to the plan" to describe a "special exception".Turning to the implementation of a comprehensive plan by Allegheny County, the… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Including the final section of the opinion (Section X), which states in its entirety: "We commend the trial judge, the Honorable Brian R. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court's request for views from the Solicitor General in Ariosa Diagnostics v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
United States, despite the government’s argument that very little was at stake. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
