Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 21,137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2018, 2:28 pm
” Leroy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:27 pm
There were two victims – Kristopher Odle, who drove to the scene to arrange a sale of marijuana ... [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
The FTC alleges Pukke perpetuated the SBE scam with a piece of parcel he should have turned over to the FTC in a 2006 order in FTC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
In El Chico v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
” The Buckeye Institute announces that it has “filed the first significant First Amendment labor-law challenge in the Supreme Court of the United States since the landmark June 27 decision in Janus v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 pm
As stated in Fox v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 1:28 pm
The oral argument in Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:11 pm
Chaset v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
We will see where that takes the people, the state, and the revolution. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals, which asks whether the “on sale” bar to the patentability of an invention is triggered by a sale in which the purchaser is required to keep the details of the invention confidential. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am
South Carolina has followed the recent trend of adopting single sales factor, which is popular in part because it exports a significant portion of tax liability to out-of-state firms. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:03 am
A creative legal theory, roundly rejected.From Dragna v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
First up is Dawson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 12:10 am
Thimmesch (Nebraska), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) & David Gamage (Indiana), Wayfair: Sales Tax Formalism and Income Tax Nexus, 89 State Tax Notes 975 (Sept. 3, 2018): This is the second of a series of essays wherein we analyze the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
Dissent: In Bluman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
” (iv) Financial Independence and s 117B(3) Characterising Ms Rhuppiah’s case as “a good example of the sometimes flimsy distinction between employment and third party support”, Lord Wilson took the view that “financial independence” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
