Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5141 - 5160 of 9,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Courts have therefore treated litigating under a pseudonym as implicating the right of public access to judicial proceedings. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
On the first question regarding foreign sales, plaintiff Lexmark relied on Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo, which held that a patent is exhausted only when the authorized first sale occurs in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:54 am
Perry Homes asked the district court to vacate the award on the ground, among others, that the Culls waived their right to arbitrate by substantially invoking the judicial process. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
  The first was the increasing utility of the Global Magnitsky Act that effectively permits a refined and targeted sanctions strategy akin to the possibilities of targeted killings made possible by refinements in drone and related technologies. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:28 am by David Urban
Supreme Court reversed and found that the District Court had properly dismissed Symczyk’s lawsuit. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
This proposed Biden-Harris "term limits" / court packing plan described above is the greatest threat to judicial independence since President Franklin D. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm by Ronald Mann
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (where this case was brought). [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm by Ronald Mann
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (where this case was brought). [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:06 pm by Holly
The Court, presided over by Judge Buescher of the District of Nebraska, agreed with HBL’s arguments, finding the patents invalid. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:39 pm
However, this changed in 1961 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided Monroe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO decision to different factual scenarios than that presented in the case decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.While the Federal District Court judges largely followed the Gallagher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
But the only case that the solicitor general cites for that proposition is Elk Grove Unified School District v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
A DMCA counternotice requires the following: The subscriber’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the subscriber consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the subscriber’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the subscriber will accept… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:36 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Two consecutive hung juries in a Pennsylvania federal district court confirm that the classification status of ride share drivers is unclear. [read post]