Search for: "Thomas View" Results 5141 - 5160 of 12,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
By focusing on the existence of the warrant prior to the stop, however, the Court seemed somewhat to obscure the fact that the discovery of the warrant (what I would view as the relevant event in the sequence) seemed to follow quite naturally from the deliberate actions of the officer.The third factor the Court contemplated was flagrancy. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:08 pm by Rory Little
The Court granted the defendants’ joint cert. petition, and today rejected the opposite view, which had been expressed by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:12 pm by Michael Dorf
Likewise, in today’s case, Thomas repeated his view that abortion is not a constitutional right. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Thomas opinion also complained of the Court’s long-standing view that doctors and clinics should be allowed to sue on behalf of their women patients to challenge anti-abortion laws. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:58 am by Yvonne Puig (US) and Eric Hoffman (US)
  Justice Thomas concluded that “as the Court applies whatever standard it likes to any given case, nothing but empty words separates our constitutional decisions from judicial fiat. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In my view, §207 does not qualify as such an offense, and the majority errs in holding otherwise. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:09 am by Cannabis Law Group
But of course, that’s pure speculation, and one that or Los Angeles marijuana lawyers believe takes a rosy view of law enforcement. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Alito has written a dissent joined by Roberts and Thomas, and Thomas has filed his own dissent. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm by David Gans
  Far from establishing a constitutional ban on the sensitive use of race by the government—the view espoused by Thomas, Alito, and Chief Justice John Roberts—the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment rejected proposals to prohibit any and all use of racial classifications by the government and, in fact, enacted a long list of forward-looking race-conscious legislation intended to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas also parted ways with the majority, but for essentially the opposite reason as Sotomayor: in his view, neither the breath nor the blood test should require a warrant. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:30 am by William Funk
But recently, there has been a frontal attack on the Auer doctrine led by the late Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas and apparently viewed sympathetically by Justice Alito and the Chief Justice. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am by Amy Howe
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissents this Term. [read post]