Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm
Printz v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:38 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:25 am
In next Wednesday’s oral argument in Washington v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
Piszczek v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:23 am
In Leor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am
United States, 195 F.2d 433, 436 (10th Cir.1952); see also, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm
Lee v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
That's the day on which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the parties' cross-appeal in San Francisco. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
Both cases discuss the impact of medical marijuana legislation.In Freightliner v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Fiden also cross-moved to preclude the plaintiff from filing any further motions except by order to show cause. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am
The other problem is that its decision in Dobbs reversing Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
According to the Second Circuit, “New York has kept the line [between federal and state jurisdiction] in sight, and gone as near as can be without crossing it. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
According to the Second Circuit, “New York has kept the line [between federal and state jurisdiction] in sight, and gone as near as can be without crossing it. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:16 am
In Walker v. [read post]
