Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 5161 - 5180 of 12,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 12:50 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
But if the defendant does contest venue, the state bears the burden of showing that it is proper. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
The next time someone tells me they’re preparing a shareholder buy-sell agreement using a fixed price memorialized in a so-called Certificate of Value, I’m going to tell them to rename it a Certificate of Legal Fees, and I’m going to tell them to read the court’s opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, anti-libel injunctions that ban repeating specific statements deter less speech than criminal libel law does: They forbid defendants only from saying particular things about the plaintiffs, while criminal libel law threatens defendants with punishment for any false and defamatory statements about anyone. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
Judge Poole was citing the Doe v Nestle ruling wherein the Ninth Circuit held “[i]n light of intervening developments in the law, we conclude that corporations can face liability for claims brought under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thinking this through is an interesting exercise. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:10 pm
The defendants appealed. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:43 am by Ron Coleman
All it does is encourages more plaintiffs to bring futile and wasteful lawsuits that impose real costs on defendants (like this case–which was inspired partially by the dicta from the Doe v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung, one doesn't have to (and I, in many ways, don't) agree with everything Apple does. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonBennington Housing Authority v. [read post]