Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 11,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:25 pm
Bassett v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Photo credit: Viorel Florescu/NY Daily News A New York trial court in Pujols v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme (C-119/22) made by the Finnish Market Court in February 2022 (see here for an English translation of the referring decision) and Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
See Rosalind English’s post. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
On 25 June 2021 Meade J handed down his decision in the second of a series of trials listed as part of the Optis v Apple UK action ([2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat); a link the judgment is here). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
(Pîx © Larry Catá Backer 2018; Bronze Cowerie Container With Sacrificial Ceremony Scene (Dian Container) Western Han Dynasty 202 BC - 8 AD; National Museum of China, Beijing )I am happy to post for comments and reactions the draft of a recently completed article: "The Ideal and Practice of Chinese Comprehensive Constitutionalism in the 'New Era'. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
A leftwing Arab Zanzibari is poisoned on a flight from Mombasa throwing suspicion on a small group of English and American tourists. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
I am happy to announce the publication of "Chinese Constitutionalism in the 'New Era': The Constitution in Emerging Idea and Practice," which appears in the latest issue of the Connecticut Journal of International Law 33(2):163-213 (2018). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in… [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
See here for a review by Judge Jürgen Schell (in German) and a review by Miquel Montañá (in English). [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
Although much of the case law referred to (including Buscarini & Ors v San Marino (1999) 30 EHRR 208) concerned the freedom not to hold religious rather than political beliefs, the principles expressed in those cases applied in this instance. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
As English courts may no longer issue anti-suit injunctions – a remedy expressly admitted to prevent that “the plaintiff will be deprived of its contractual rights in a situation in which damages are manifestly an inadequate remedy” (Lord Millett in The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87) – it seems very likely that damage awards will become much more prevalent in English courts. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The case will proceed in the English court.Unless it settles, we can expect this case to pop up in a later volume of Retromark.5. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad On May 15, 2023, in a landmark decision for Italy’s cultural heritage property protection, Florence’s Gallerie dell’Accademia prevailed in its legal battle to secure its image rights to Michelangelo’s iconic David sculpture.[1] The Gallerie initiated the lawsuit against the publishing house Edizioni Conde Nast, who appropriated the 16th-century sculpture’s likeness three years prior for the cover of GQ Italia in an “openly advertising… [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
Electric Co. v. [read post]
