Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
IntroductionWhen an ex-offender is forced to move from his/her home, thus having to sell it, cannot find another home within the law due to the residency "buffer" zones, get fired from their jobs due to being on the registry, cannot find a new job due to being on the registry, their husband/wife lose their jobs due to a significant other being on the registry, their children lose their friends and are harassed and bullied in school due to a family member being on the… [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:53 am
Richins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused its discretion in denying wife's requests for attorney's fees and costs where husband has ability to pay and requiring wife to pay her own fees would result in diminution of her equitable distribution funds -- Equitable distribution -- Marital/nonmarital assets -- Trial court erred in finding that property acquired by limited… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
In Hicks v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
At the rate things are going in the case of State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:41 pm
Barnes, 231 Va. 39, 42, 340 S.E.2d 803, 804 (1986) (holding that when a husband and wife separate and employ attorneys, their former confidential and fiduciary relationship ends) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Mosley v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:16 pm
" Vick v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:11 am
See, for example, Verna v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Only one South Carolina case discusses this issue, Widman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
In Cummings v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
It seems as though the wife was asserting that she was not sure. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:45 pm
For the leading modern court opinion on whether the tort should be retained, see Fitch v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
The Basic Facts: Plaintiff was the husband of a deceased motorist who was killed in a multi-vehicle accident. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Thus, as counsel for the wife said, it is not readily apparent what the husband’s real needs are, and in any event, to use the words of Smithers J, “[t]his aspect of the case should be of moderate significance only” and “the outcome of the case should depend largely upon the extensive contributions of the parties over so many years”.Next, in addressing the husband’s submissions that the trial judge failed to adequately take into… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:54 pm
Yet, since the case of McLaughlin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:03 am
The mistake being that of the lawyers and filing only one day out of time is of particular significance (see Jess v Scott and Others (1986) 70 ALR 185 a decision of the Federal Court particularly at p.189 to 191 where the solicitor in that matter was also out of time by one day).Without considering the merits of the appeal any more than is necessary for this application, it can be seen that to deprive the husband of an opportunity to appeal, where the filing was one day out of… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:31 am
A recent decision was entered by the Pennsylvania Superior Court, Balicki v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:37 am
Wilson, the nursing home resident’s wife, Judith Wilson, was successfully sued for $45,243.24 in unpaid nursing home bills of her husband, Robert Wilson. [read post]
