Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm
French summarized those expert costs: . . . the cost of [Nathan Associates'] expert assistance in individual plaintiff antitrust cases has ranged from about $300 thousand to more than $2 million. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
” Swan Turton has a report here, as does PA Media Lawyer (subscription required). [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
[Link] The Florida Bar 3rd Annual IP Law Symposium will be held on March 1-2 on Orlando. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
STAT. sec. 9.10(2)(h) and (3)(b). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:51 am
” Among the reasons this is worth reading (even if you don’t care about admiralty): 1. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:46 pm
(b)”Direct contest” in an instrument or in this chapter means a pleading in a proceeding in any court alleging the invalidity of an instrument or one or more of its terms based on one or more of the following grounds: (1)Revocation. (2)Lack of capacity. (3)Fraud. (4)Misrepresentation. (5)Menace. (6)Duress. (7)Undue influence. (8)Mistake. (9)Lack of due execution. (10)Forgery. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
Louis, MO ABA TECHSHOW 2012 March 29-31, 2012 Chicago, IL APRIL ACEDS 2012 Conference April 2 - 4, 2012 Hollywood, FL 12th Annual Super Conference April 23 - 24, 2012 Chicago, IL MAY 2012 World Technology Law Conference & Annual Meeting May 3 - 4, 2012 Washington, DC INSIGHT 2012 Law Firm IT - Conference and Exposition May 8 - 9, 2012 London, UK EDRM 2012 - 2013 Kickoff Meeting May 16 - 17, 2012 St. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
It would only be equitable if every retail market tested 1 - 2 lbs. of ground beef every 10,000 lbs. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
Law enforcement officers may seize evidence in plain view if `(1) the seizing officer is lawfully present at the place from which the evidence can be plainly viewed; (2) the seizing officer has a lawful right of access to the object itself; and (3) the object's incriminating character is immediately apparent. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Among the notable holdings were the trial court’s insistence that: (1) the monitoring proponents adduce epidemiologic evidence that the exposure at issue can actually cause the latent injury for which monitoring is sought; (2) the proponents of monitoring identify highly sensitive tests, which when deployed on the exposed population that has a relatively high prevalence of the latent injury, will have a high predictive value; and (3) the proposed monitoring will… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:22 am
Of course, my perception of the scope of prior user rights would change dramatically if the courts determine that (1) a prior user need only prove prior commercial use using a more-likely-than-not standard that (2) allowed oral testimony alone to prove the case and (3) ruled that neither secret sales nor secret uses constitute prior art under the new 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:36 am
” Id. at 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:31 am
Rev. 567 (1999) Godbold, John, Twenty Pages and Twenty Minutes, 15 Litig. 3 (Spring 1989) (PDF) Greaney, John M. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
This defense does not apply here either. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:40 am
A person executing a will must know and understand: (1) the nature and the effect of her act; (2) the property she possesses; and (3) the manner in which her property will be distributed under the will. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
" 2. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm
They were social. 3. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
— sued some John Doe defendants in federal court over an offensive video attacking former (but then current) opponent Jon Huntsman. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
(3) Effective/applicability date. [read post]
