Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 42,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm
M., any arguably reprehensible conduct the company ever committed - no matter how tangentially related to Ms. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:42 am
However, general knowledge of the industry is not a substitute for the requirement that evidence on a specific matter ought to be expected to be presented by one or other of the parties so the other party has an opportunity to test the proposition on cross examination or respond with their own evidence. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In reviewing the issue of admissibility of the expert’s opinion, the court reviewed Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 702 and the case of Frye v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:10 pm
In Matter of LaRusso v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 5:21 pm
I.e., no matter how reasonable an Examiner's interpretation of a claim term, he cannot get away with the interpretation if it's not consistent with the specification. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:15 am
The government argued that, in addition to Rule 16, there were numerous grounds for excluding Professor Fischel's testimony, including Rules 401, 403, 602, 702, and 703 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:41 pm
Why Burden of Proof Standards Matter So Much The difference between these two standards is significant. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Liability may attach if the officer is adjudged in hindsight to have acted outside the scope of his or her delegated authority or to have failed to act on a matter that was not (sic) within his or her expected areas of responsibility.[8] More recently, five decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the business judgment rule applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
These exceptional circumstances should be expressly defined in the rules, said the Society, and the employee submitting Form TRC to the Commission should provide an explanation with evidence of these specified circumstances.The Society also suggested that a company should have 120-days after being notified of a securities law violation by a whistleblower to investigate, remediate and report back to the tipper. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:10 pm
Whether the trial court’s decision should be reversed because it committed plain error in relying on the opinion testimony of a guardian ad litem who was not qualified as an expert and who’s opinion was not based on a rational perception within the meaning of Rule 701 of the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
The Court of Appeals went on to explain that in challenging his conviction, Heisler “contends that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the text messages he sent to the victim because they were not properly authenticated under [Colorado Rules of Evidence] 901(a). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 9:32 am
The district court here compared the restrictions in this matter with those followed in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:17 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that a police officer cannot legally testify that a defendant was high on marijuana based on observations and a field sobriety test. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:36 am
Rule 56 says that affidavits and declarations “must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Alliance, with claimsfound obvious:Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
Every aspect of the trial has to be planned in advance, with multiple levels of contingency planning for when testimony, rulings or evidence goes awry. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
It is one thing for the government to investigate the feasibility of state intervention on pressing matters of social concern based on robust evidence of some underlying phenomenon. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
The question of overall fairness for the purposes of Article 6(1) must be examined in the light of all the facts and circumstances, and is therefore a matter for determination by the High Court of Justiciary [33]. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
“When a party moves to strike [evidence], it is that party’s duty to bring his motion to the attention of the trial court and to get a ruling on the motion. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The first in Rule 44(a)(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides: (A) In General. [read post]
