Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 5161 - 5180 of 28,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 8:03 am by Dennis Crouch
And in 1976 [the year FSIA was passed], the state of that body of law was clear: A “taking of property” could be “wrongful under international law” only where a state deprived “an alien” of property. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But whom, if any of the perpetrators and their supporters, should be given “a pass,” or nothing more than lenient treatment? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:47 am by ACLU
v=Gy7QRZ4uMu0What is the ACLU’s position on policing? [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm by Katherine McKeen
Although the Court later held RFRA to be unconstitutional if it were to be applied to state policies, many U.S. states proceeded to pass “mini-RFRA” laws that applied a similar standard to local regulations. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on the Massachusetts… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Carhart’s (2007) perilous holding that legislatures have “wide discretion to pass legislation in areas where there is medical and scientific uncertainty. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Daphne Keller
That law prohibits providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations that the State Department designates, in a formal process that permits organizations to appeal the designation. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Prior to implementation of this policy, a federal law known as the Helms Amendment, passed in 1973, already prevented the actual use of U.S. funds to pay “for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning. [read post]
 The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Financial Review reports that NSW has warned its patience is running out with states that have not passed uniform defamation laws, and that it is ready to commence the new regime on 1 July 2021. [read post]
However, the law also stipulates that the medication must not have been developed in an “aggressor state,” thereby prohibiting the use of the Russian COVID-19 vaccine, Sputnik V. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:35 am by INFORRM
State of KarnatakaDecision Date: May 13, 2020 The High Court of Karnataka refused to pass any order directing the government to frame guidelines in relation to hate speech. [read post]