Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 5161 - 5180 of 9,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization were ordered to repay more than $450m for fraudulent gains in February. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:08 am
The third type of problem, exercise of power of without authority, is suggested by the Appellate Division's decision Tuesday in People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am by Giles Peaker
An example would be where the landlord gets the year wrong, as in Pease v Carter (where a notice of possession proceedings served on 7th November 2018 stated that court proceedings would not begin until after 26th November 2017, an obvious typographical error). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
GTA Linux User's Group, Political Outreach Group (David Collier-Brown, Editor) Slaw readers may have noticed a flurry of interest around Voltage v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:26 am by BakerHostetler
It also contained a number of limitations: Law No. 94-V does not extend to the collection of personal data for personal and family needs; the use of information for the Kazakhstani National Archive; the collection, processing, and protection of personal data related to Kazakhstani state secrets; or the use of information related to intelligence, counter-intelligence, and criminal activities, within legal limits. 5. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Putting governments’ actions into words, government spending is guided by the political wisdom that states: “there are no votes in justice,” i.e., there are no significant quantities of votes to be gained by spending significant quantities of taxpayers’ money on the justice system. [read post]