Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 7:13 am
In Bilski v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:06 pm
Justices Sotomayor and Stevens dissented from this part of the opinion, but joined in the unanimous decision that there is no claim for tortious interference under federal law.The opinion in Granite Rock Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
The ruling states that criminal suspects who want to exercise the “right to remain silent” promised to them by Miranda v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Yesterday, in Magwood v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
United States, http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1394.pdf Black v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
As suggested in this Blog’s May 2009 entry, the Third Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:12 am
Justice Sotomayor did not participate. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
Justice Sotomayor did not participate. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
I actually had a better seat than Nina Totenberg from NPR and Bill Mears of CNN; both were present to hear the opinions read from the bench.The high-point from that session was Chief Justice John Roberts reading the 6-3 majority opinion in the case of Humanitarian Law Project v Holder; followed by Justice Stephen Breyer reading his dissent (joined by Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
Sotomayor would seem like the natural for Pottawattamie County, which involved the immunity of state prosecutors from civil liability, because Sotomayor served as a state criminal prosecutor under New York City’s Robert Morgenthau. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
” The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States 3)Magwood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:46 pm
That case, Skilling v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting, argues that the pre-trial sentiment in Houston against Enron, and Skilling, in particular, was as virulent as the types the Court has held warranted transfer: Rideau v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
See Yates v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
" Justice Sotomayor did not take part in the case. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:06 am
Especially conspicuous: In Skilling v. [read post]
