Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 5161 - 5180 of 5,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
September 28, 2021 | States Regain Regulatory Power Over Predatory Loan Servicers | The Education Department’s new interpretation of federal law empowers states to protect student loan borrowers. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
The volume’s editors (Arizona State University’s David H. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
The biggest question: at what level of granularity do you need to state the "want" at issue? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am by Florian Mueller
For one example, let me refer you to Philip Elmer-Dewitt's article on how I was right and mainstream media were wrong on the March 1, 2013 Apple v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:59 am by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without a Handle” – Mobile Tools This post continues my thoughts on qualities of digital tools that have helped make political and artistic expression more subjective, accessible and fluid. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
Whilst framed as regulation of tech companies, the White Paper’s target is the activities and communications of online users. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Specifically, the SEC alleged that Mayweather failed to disclose promotional payments from three ICO issuers, including $100,000 from Centra Tech, Inc. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
  Is there any evidence that over the 12 years, during the flowering of the so-called surveillance state, Americans have become less politically active? [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
This highly speculative study ignores the illegality of China's actions and fails to consider the harm those actions have caused to high-tech manufacturing jobs in the solar sector. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Regulatory Discretion Fosters Clean Tech September 18, 2023 | Shon Hiatt, USC Marshall School of Business, and Jake B. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Box 100 Hebron, CT 06248-0100 Phone: (860) 228-9438; (800) 832-4409 (Toll Free) E-mail: johnq@eastersealsofct.org Web: http://www.ct.easter-seals.org Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center of Central Connecticut, Inc. 158 State Street, P.O. [read post]