Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 16,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" Another coworker, who worked with petitioner approximately once per week, testified similarly to his surprise over petitioner's termination due to her strong work ethic. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" Another coworker, who worked with petitioner approximately once per week, testified similarly to his surprise over petitioner's termination due to her strong work ethic. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
Renault may not have intervened in all Nokia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
In the recent case of Varrenti v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:24 am
In judging the affirmative action program in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:57 am
(Carsey-Werner Company, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:37 am
Additional Resources:In re: The Visitation of L-A.D.W., R.W. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
The Court added: “State agencies controlled by active market participants, who possess singularly strong private interests, pose the very risk of self-dealing Midcal’s supervision requirement was created to address. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:08 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing detriment to the… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
” The Appellate Division then unanimously reversed the lower court’s rulings “on the law,” vacating the default judgment, denying Rivera’s petition and dismissing the proceeding.* Termination of an employee for failure to posses a valid license required to perform the duties of the position is not disciplinary in nature and thus was subject to neither the pre-termination disciplinary procedures set out in a collective bargaining agreement nor the provisions of… [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 10:37 pm
Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who has been presiding over Apple v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The determination of the secretary of state’s true purpose in making the deportation order was pivotal to assessing the lawfulness of the detention (R v Governor of Brixton Prison Ex p Soblen (No2) (1963) 2 QB 243 CA). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:14 pm
Some states, like Florida, have strong restrictive covenant laws codified by statute. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a recent post on Kaur v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:02 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr posts about a decision, State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
Comer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm
But I do not think that it stands with regards to the other variants that we will be exploring -- namely the experimental variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.2') and the state-capitalist variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.3'). [read post]
