Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 6,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
USPTO Director David Kappos The United States Patent and Trademark Office today issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes changes to the rules governing ex parte patent appeals before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP) Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:32 pm
We handle hundreds of new patent applications each year, with offices located nationwide and near the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
YouTube 2nd Circuit appeal (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trademarks & Domain Names Seattle’s US Attorney’s Office seizes domain names linked to counterfeiting (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions TTAB precedential no. 43: TTAB reverses genericness refusal of THUMBDRIVE for portable storage devices (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(a) scandalousness refusal of BIG EFFIN GARAGE for Music Website (TTABlog) District… [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
In 2012, the USPTO chose Detroit as the location for its first satellite office because Detroit and its surrounding communities are home to one of the largest concentrations of intellectual property attorneys in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 9:05 am
In 2012, the USPTO chose Detroit as the location for its first satellite office because Detroit and its surrounding communities are home to one of the largest concentrations of intellectual property attorneys in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:42 pm
United States, 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Facebook awarded US patent for ‘news feed’ technology (Daily Dose of IP) (Tangible IP) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Arcade) (BlawgIT) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) 9th Circuit: Domains are property subject to levy where the registry is located Office Depot v.… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Facebook awarded US patent for ‘news feed’ technology (Daily Dose of IP) (Tangible IP) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Arcade) (BlawgIT) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) 9th Circuit: Domains are property subject to levy where the registry is located Office Depot v.… [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 3:01 pm
The discussion took place mainly between the delegations of the United States Patent and Trademarks Office (USPTO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:50 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) found that the claims were anticipated by U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 6:51 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and United States Copyright Office (USCO) will hold a public roundtable discussion concerning the work at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) on the proposed Treaty on the Protection of the Rights of Broadcasting Organizations. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Global Global – Patents Patent strategy for China (IP Think Strategy) US and UK unite for some more sweet patent harmony (IPKat) Current developments in the Trilateral Patent Offices – EU, Japan and US (Patent Law Practice Center) Africa Bananas are great – but what about wilt-free patents too? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for publications… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for publications… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:58 pm
Press”) appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”) reversing […] the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 1–17 and 19–60 […] of U.S. [read post]
