Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2019, 4:47 am
One of the US provisionals named an inventor-applicant who was not named on the PCT application. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
Many, but not all, states that enforce non-compete agreements recognize that “continued employment” is sufficient consideration to support the use of a non-compete agreement. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:05 pm
In the fair use arena, we have Aufderheide and Jaszi's Reclaiming Fair Use detailing best practices within specific content-creative communities. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
I can't find any articles on this topic when I google use a search engine, but maybe the IPKat's readers have more information ...? [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:52 pm
” Other claims of the ’601 patent do require the use of a “plurality of sensors” to (with minor variations in the language used) “sense the presence of the containers stored in the collating unit. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Thanks, Sebastian, for writing this up for us! [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
The first phone was a greatinvention, but the second onereally came in handy ...Three days to go ... and the IPKat's sidebar poll on the European Inventor Award has passed the 500 responses mark. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
| Prosecution history - as relevant as any inventor evidence? [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:58 am
Bauer’s motives for listing himself as the ’773 patent inventor, . . . we find this error harmless because [the patent owner’s] own evidence . . . provided a sufficient basis on which to infer that Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
The Ninth Circuit found that the defendant was not the sole inventor, and thus held that the claim might have been misleading. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Patent No. 10,405,277 on a "method for reducing power consumption of terminal in mobile communication system using multi-carrier structure"U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
* Protection of Traditional Knowledge - governments are the problem and Nagoya is not the solutionVeteran Katfriend Professor Graham Dutfield lends us his measured judgement on a subject that raises passions as well as problems. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
On the one hand, innovation will be discouraged if inventors, authors and other creators of intellectual property are not allowed to benefit from their labors. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
This time, Laetitia tells us a bit about non-conventional trade marks. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
It is intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors in order to benefit the public. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 1:20 pm
Selden's US patent actually issued in 1895 and expired in 1912. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
IdANDIn 1999, Chiba itself suggested treating multiplesclerosis using a solid oral form of fingolimod. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:21 am
In Chapter 8, Daryl Lim discusses the Kimble decision of the US Supreme Court which, while acknowledging the criticism of other judges and scholars, upheld the patent misuse doctrine as a necessary defence against use of rights where such use collided with the patent legislature’s intentions. [read post]
5 May 2013, 11:01 am
The project is a brainchild of Sumit Dagar, a graduate from National Institute of Design.Constitutionality challenge to Bollywood amendmentsIn this week's featured post, Prashant briefly takes us through the arguments raised by film producers led by Bharat Anand and JMV Movies Pvt. [read post]
