Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 501 - 520
of 11,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2012, 9:40 am
However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and remanded the case for a trial. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:46 am
GundersenGlenn observes that "[t]he Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has seen a significant drop in applicants who appeal examining attorneys' refusals to register new marks, as well as a decrease in the number of parties involved in contentious proceedings. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 3:33 am
Based on the above, the Patent and Trademark Office was thus not obliged to examine the question of double protection ex officio. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 11:30 pm
This would have meant that the BoA would have needed to remit the case to the Examining Division for a new search thereby going beyond the scope of appeal proceedings that are primarily concerned with examining the contested decision rather than to continue examination (G 10/93). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:34 am
Read this letter carefully. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:51 am
Section 16(1) of the 1970 Act reads: Where it is agreed by the terms of the submission that there may be an appeal from the award, an appeal lies to the Divisional Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Defining the Exceptions Continue reading [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 1:53 pm
Thus, the prosecution will start with their witnesses — who are sworn under oath — subject to cross-examination by the defense attorneys. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:05 pm
After the Examining Division had issued the requested decision, the applicant filed the present appeal and, with its statement of grounds of appeal, replaced its sole substantive request with a new main request and first and second auxiliary request. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
It will make funny reading for the Appeals Council at least while we win this man’s case. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
It will make funny reading for the Appeals Council at least while we win this man’s case. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
Limitation on cross-examination related to Sell hearing was not error; trial court properly denied defendant’s request for special instruction on insanity. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:27 am
Continue reading [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:57 am
HeatMax, an appeal of rejections in an inter partes re-exam [95/001,311 of US 6,936,018 ], the Patent Trial and Appeal Board [PTAB] affirmed the Examiner's Rejections.The format of the decision grouped rejections with grounds, e.g. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:30 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 4 for the portion dealing with the notice period; 1.5 for the balance.R. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 9:08 am
Appeals Court Decision The standard of review for looking at whether a read-back is appropriate is an abuse of discretion standard. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:07 am
Evidence of Technical Effects: The Coordination inquired about the BRPTO’s existing examination guidelines that already allow appellants to adduce evidence to convince the examiner about the technical effects of the invention. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:20 pm
Read the material you obtain. [read post]
