Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 501 - 520 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by INFORRM
   He also pointed out that the claimant’s reliance only on the front page of the newspaper and not on the article in Sports Section was contrary to the principle in Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([1995] 2 AC 65) – that a claim for libel could not be founded on a headline or photograph in isolation from the related text. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:06 pm
So the ‘rule’ in Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1989] AC 1280 that the without prejudice rule covers any subsequent litigation based on the same facts does not apply. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
DIS=151622 [2] For the legal statement, please refer to: https://technation.io/lawtechukpanel/ [3] For the decision of Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (In Liquidation) [2020] NZHC 728, please refer to: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2020/728.html [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
.'It is very interesting to compare AK Roy and several subsequent cases which have taken the same route with a British case decided by the far less 'activist' House of Lords:In Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) the House of Lords held that it was unlawful for the Home Secretary to introduce changes to a scheme which were incompatible with an Act of Parliament. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am by Charon QC
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
" This means that a claimant must prove as a fact that his reputation has actually suffered serious harm as a result of the publication complained of, or that this is likely to happen: Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, [2020] AC 612. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm by INFORRM
The Judge followed the recent decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Vestergaard Fransden A/S v Bestnet Europe Ltd [2010] FSR 2; “The decision in Schering Chemicals was analysed in Vestergaard. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Dennis Crouch
  The building was owned by Stonefield Estates Ltd but the entire building is subject to a 20-year lease to Dreamland Leisure. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:00 am by Bill Marler
– Canada May 21, 2022 Rainbow Asset Limited – Hong Kong:May 23, 2022 Randy Ltd. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
He accepts that if regulations are laid his case might not fall within them but claims to have standing under the new approach to Scottish public law title and interest set out in AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, [2012] 1 AC 868, 2011 SLT 106. [read post]
26 May 2022, 7:32 pm by Bill Marler
– Canada May 21, 2022 Rainbow Asset Limited – Hong Kong:May 23, 2022 Randy Ltd. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
This changed with the decision of the House of Lords in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd  [2002] 1 AC 215. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 1:32 am
  A recent example of just how preposterous things are getting recently came from New Orleans when the Fifth Circuit decided Gore Design Completions, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm by emagraken
Courthouse Technologies Ltd., 2005 BCCA 605, 48 B.C.L.R. (4th) 328. [read post]