Search for: "Affordable Express Corp." Results 501 - 520 of 632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical manufacturers are particularly vulnerable to securities fraud claims arising from the manufacturers’ pronouncements about safety or efficacy, the evidence for which is often statistical in nature. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Thomas Kaufman
Certification of Rest Period Claim It appears from the record presented that Brinker Corp. controlled the timing of rest breaks. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:50 pm by Erin Miller
  He expresses himself clearly and has a direct and understated style of writing. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
’[8] As Justice Allsop observed in Incitec v Alkimos Shipping Corp, ‘the question is one of the exercise of a discretion in all the circumstances, but recognising that the starting point is the fact that the parties have agreed to litigate elsewhere, and should, absent some strong countervailing circumstances, be held to their bargain. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:01 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
When the court challenge failed (NationsBank Corp v Herman, 4thCir, No 98-1127, April 6, 1999 (75 EPD ¶45,814); cert. denied, sub nom. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
" 445 F.3d at 474.Basically, a drug company would be crazy to open a compassionate use program just for one person - nor could one person afford to pay the "cost" of all the overhead compassionate use required.The court dismissed these cost considerations as "trivial. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
         Section 110(f) of NHPA provides that "[p]rior to the approval of any Federal undertaking which may directly and adversely affect any National Historic Landmark" the agency "shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions as may be necessary to minimize harm to such landmark, and shall afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
., 347 NLRB No. 80 (2006) and has responded in that decision to the Chairman's expressed disagreement with the standard. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am by Gus Hurwitz
[Wrapping up the first week of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a post from Truth on the Market’s own Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, director of law & economics programs at the International Center for Law & Economics and an assistant professor of law and co-director of the Space, Cyber, and Telecom Law program at the University of Nebraska College of Law. [read post]