Search for: "Alvarez v. Ins*" Results 501 - 520 of 702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the Meighan defendants failed to demonstrate the existence of any triable issues of fact with respect to their liability for legal malpractice (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780, 784; Jampolskaya v Victor Gomelsky, P.C., 36 AD3d 761, 762). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  The first was Freeman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
A.D. 2002) (Bexis’ case); Alvarez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:38 am by Aaron Tang
Alvarez-Machain still lends itself to considerable uncertainty and is far from definitive. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Nabiha Syed
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alvarez), and in the process decide the scope of First Amendment protection for knowingly false statements of fact. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm by Phil Cave
Alvarez, Docket: 11-210, Issue: Whether the Stolen Valor Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Viking
Alvarez, Docket: 11-210, Issue: Whether the Stolen Valor Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
Alvarez Docket: 11-210 Issue: Whether the Stolen Valor Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:42 am by Tejinder Singh
After the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]