Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 501 - 520 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, by contrast, adhered to “a bright-line rule, holding that a manufacturer of a bare-metal product is never liable for injuries caused by later-added asbestos-containing materials. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
Judge Johnson is not only an accomplished writer of historical fiction, but he is also an astute evaluator of the facts and data, and the accompanying lawyers’ rhetoric, thrown about in pharmaceutical products liability litigation. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Third, the trial court in Cook had to ignore the federal judiciary’s own reference manual’s warnings about the inability of ecological studies to provide causal inferences.8 The Cook case is part of an unfortunate trend to regard all studies as “flawed,” and their relative weights simply a matter of argument and debate for the litigants.9 Abilify Another example of sloppy reasoning about confounding can be found in a recent federal trial court decision, In re Abilify… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm by Schachtman
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Factual Background In Halliburton, the shareholder plaintiffs maintain that from 1999 to 2001, Halliburton made false and misleading statements that understated its asbestos liability and overstated its revenues. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am by Schachtman
Minn. 2008) (extensive review of all expert evidence proffered in multidistricted product liability case). [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  For example, evidence acquired in tire products liability cases led to the federal tire safety law of 1966. [read post]