Search for: "BARNES v. DEFENSE " Results 501 - 520 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
Barnes reports for the New York Times. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Section 230 immunity: Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes writes, "Justices Uphold Lethal Injection Procedure. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We were impressed with reader response we had to the 50-state survey we did not too long ago on informal defense communication with treating physicians, so we've decided to present the medical monitoring issue in a similar fashion.The questions before the house are what states have adopted medical monitoring, which have rejected it, and what quirks are there? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]