Search for: "Barton v. Barton" Results 501 - 520 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] Therefore I can confidently state that CanLII’s national market will earn more than enough money. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Barton Beebe has discussed what TM owners do to keep consumers in their place, but it’s very hard to keep them there. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The Law Society of British Columbia’s E-Brief for January 2019 states that LSBC has established a Futures Task Force: “… to look at the future of the legal profession and legal regulation in British Columbia. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
(Oxford University Press, 2008), page 2] In Canada, the prohibition against lawyers being employed to provide services to the customers of their employers[ii] can be overcome by a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms “public freedom for access to the courts” argument based upon s. 2(b)’s, “freedom of opinion and expression”; see: Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1), 1983 CanLII 1707 (ONCA), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; plus an extended use of, Endean v. [read post]