Search for: "Best Products, Inc. v. Best Products Co., Inc"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Supreme Court decision in Brulotte v Thys Co. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Because of the potential legal risks under the Code and ERISA, employers evaluating compliance to determine whether to file a Form 8928 generally should consult with legal counsel about whether and how best to structure and conduct the health plan compliance review to preserve distinctions between their business operations and fiduciary activities performed on behalf of the plan, as well as any opportunities to use attorney-client privilege,… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
” For a variety of reasons, the law views many aspects of agricultural production as significantly different from other industrial enterprises. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 2014 WL 6765718 (S.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
AutoInfo, Inc., C.A. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
Case Law: From: Cede & Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:11 am
Instead, in future cases when an employer argues that it has a confidentiality interest in protecting witness statements from disclosure, the Board shall apply the balancing test set forth in Detroit Edison v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
Even there, how a law review discussion of “whether preemption would apply to common law claims when the manufacturers deceived the FDA,” id. at 204, can occur without citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 122 Cal. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
Upjohn Co., 890 S.W.2d 425, 434 (Tenn. 1994) (stating pharmacists have duty to exercise standard of care required of pharmacy profession in same or similar communities); Schaerrer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Thus, it might be reasonable for a fire truck manufacturer to spend five or six years considering the reintroduction of a brand, even though the same passage of time would be unreasonable for a maker of a more ephemeral product, say potato chips Emergency One, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
", here; "Global IP: the British are (almost, sort of) best", here]. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
”’ Central Radio Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
Many such products will be compliant with the noncommercial exception, arguably. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Vanderbilt Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Under this framework, the physician should be held liable for failing to act in the patient’s best interests, taking into account the patient’s unique clinical condition and value preferences. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse; Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand:… [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
See Grossman v. [read post]
